<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Build Something Similar on FlexWest</title><link>https://flexwest.com/eot/build-something-similar/</link><description>Recent content in Build Something Similar on FlexWest</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://flexwest.com/eot/build-something-similar/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Toward a Network of Mutual Support</title><link>https://flexwest.com/eot/build-something-similar/network-of-mutual-support/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://flexwest.com/eot/build-something-similar/network-of-mutual-support/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Everything on this site so far describes one company. But if this
bootstrap method — perpetual trust ownership, automation focus,
sortition governance — actually works and other people or groups
adopt it too, a natural question follows: could these entities
help each other, the way a family of cooperatives already does at
Mondragon Corporation, one of the largest and longest-running
worker-cooperative networks in the world?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a far-off dream, not a plan — nothing like it exists yet,
and it depends entirely on the more basic bootstrap idea working
at all, more than once. But it&amp;rsquo;s worth describing, because it&amp;rsquo;s
the natural extension of &amp;ldquo;I hope this method spreads&amp;rdquo; into &amp;ldquo;and
once it has, here&amp;rsquo;s what could come next.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why I Think This Time Is Different</title><link>https://flexwest.com/eot/build-something-similar/why-this-time-is-different/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://flexwest.com/eot/build-something-similar/why-this-time-is-different/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Everything else on this site describes what I&amp;rsquo;m building and why.
This page is different — it&amp;rsquo;s my own opinion, based on 50 years of
hands-on, cross-disciplinary experience, not something I&amp;rsquo;m asking
you to take as settled fact. I could be wrong. But I think it&amp;rsquo;s
important to say plainly, because it&amp;rsquo;s the belief underneath
everything else here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;rsquo;t think this round of automation is like the others.
Historically, when a new technology automated a category of work,
people moved to a different category — farm labor gave way to
industrial jobs, industrial automation gave way to service and
knowledge work. That pattern gets cited constantly as a reason not
to worry this time either: automation has always eventually
created more jobs than it destroyed, so why would now be
different?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>